Lyme neuroborreliosis — the term for neurological Lyme disease — is documented in peer-reviewed literature going back to the 1980s. It affects both the peripheral nervous system (the nerves outside the brain and spinal cord) and the central nervous system (the brain and spinal cord itself). It can produce radically different presentations depending on which part of the nervous system is involved, how long the infection has been active, and what co-infections are present alongside it.
What makes neurological Lyme especially difficult is a persistent mismatch between clinical experience and test results. Standard scans frequently appear normal. Standard Lyme tests miss a significant proportion of cases. And when a neurologist sees a patient with white matter lesions, or progressive cognitive decline, or severe nerve pain, the diagnostic category they reach for is usually one of the well-established conditions — MS, Alzheimer’s, fibromyalgia, idiopathic neuropathy — rather than an infectious cause. This page is about understanding what is actually happening, and why the diagnostic path so often leads somewhere unhelpful.
How Lyme enters and damages the nervous system
Borrelia burgdorferi is a neurotropic spirochete — a corkscrew-shaped bacterium with a demonstrated ability to enter and persist in nervous system tissue. Understanding how it does this is essential to understanding why neurological symptoms are so varied, so persistent, and so difficult to treat.
The blood-brain barrier regulates what enters the brain and spinal cord. Borrelia burgdorferi has been shown in research to actively cross this barrier — it binds to and penetrates the endothelial cells that form the barrier wall. Once inside, it gains access to the central nervous system, where standard antibiotics penetrate poorly and the immune response is limited.
Borrelia has been detected in brain tissue, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves in post-mortem studies. It can invade neurons, glial cells, and the dorsal root ganglia — clusters of sensory nerve cell bodies that relay pain and sensation signals. Invasion of the dorsal root ganglia is the primary mechanism behind radicular pain and sensory neuropathy.
Even when Borrelia is not directly present in nerve tissue, the immune response it generates is itself neurotoxic. Elevated inflammatory cytokines disrupt nerve signalling, damage myelin (the protective coating on nerve fibres), and create conditions in which nerves fire abnormally. This produces symptoms even in the absence of structural damage that would be visible on imaging.
Some research suggests that antibodies the immune system produces against Borrelia proteins cross-react with nerve tissue proteins that share similar molecular sequences. In this autoimmune mechanism, the immune system’s own response attacks the nervous system — which may explain why some neurological symptoms persist even after bacterial load has been reduced by antibiotic treatment.
Research found it took an average of eighteen months after infection for peripheral nervous system symptoms to manifest, and two years for central nervous system symptoms to appear. This delay is clinically important: by the time neurological symptoms become prominent, the tick bite may be long forgotten, and the connection between infection and neurological decline is rarely made.
Borrelia can form biofilms — communities of bacteria enclosed in a protective matrix that resists antibiotics and immune clearance — in nervous system tissue. Research by Alan MacDonald and others has detected Borrelia biofilms in brain tissue of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. In biofilm form, the bacteria can remain dormant before reactivating, which may explain the relapsing-remitting course seen in some patients.
The full neurological symptom picture
The range of neurological symptoms in Lyme disease is wide enough that many patients receive several different neurological diagnoses before the underlying infection is considered. The following list represents the documented range — not every patient experiences all of these, and the pattern varies significantly depending on disease stage, co-infections, and individual immune response.
Documented neurological symptoms in tick-borne illness
- Numbness, tingling, or burning sensations in the extremities — hands, feet, arms, legs
- Electric-shock sensations, shooting pains, or waves of burning moving through the body
- Radicular pain — pain radiating from the spine into an extremity, resembling disc herniation
- Facial numbness or tingling — often on one side, sometimes both
- Facial nerve palsy (Bell’s palsy) — partial or complete drooping of one side of the face
- Trigeminal neuralgia — severe, electric, stabbing pain in the face along the jaw, cheek, or forehead
- Head pressure — a heaviness or fullness inside the skull, not a typical headache
- Migraine-like or constant low-grade headache
- Brain fog — difficulty thinking, word retrieval failure, inability to hold a chain of thought
- Memory gaps, short-term memory fragility, difficulty forming new memories
- Cognitive fatigue — mental effort that exhausts disproportionately to its demand
- Dizziness, imbalance, or feeling of unreality in space
- Tinnitus — ringing, hissing, buzzing, or pulsing in the ears
- Visual disturbances — blurring, double vision, light sensitivity, or visual snow
- Sensitivity to light, sound, or strong smells
- Sleep disturbance — inability to reach deep sleep, early waking, reversed sleep cycle
- Tremors — fine trembling in the hands or other areas
- Muscle twitching (fasciculations) — involuntary muscle movement
- Weakness — asymmetric, fluctuating, or positional
- Progressive cognitive decline in late or untreated disease
Neuroborreliosis is documented in approximately 15% of patients with acute Lyme disease. However, the actual rate of neurological involvement — including subclinical nerve damage detectable only on electrophysiological testing — is substantially higher. In one landmark study, peripheral nerve dysfunction was demonstrable in 36% of patients with late Lyme disease, the majority of whom had normal neurological examinations.
Peripheral neuropathy — types, patterns, and what makes Lyme different
Peripheral neuropathy means damage or dysfunction of the nerves outside the brain and spinal cord — the vast network that carries sensation from the skin and organs to the brain, and motor signals from the brain to the muscles. In Lyme disease, peripheral neuropathy is among the most common neurological manifestations, and among the most poorly recognised.
A landmark study published in Neurology in 1992 evaluated 25 patients with Lyme disease and chronic peripheral neuropathy. All had immunological evidence of Borrelia exposure and no other identifiable cause. Neuropathic symptoms had begun a median of eight months after initial infection and had been present on average for a year before evaluation. Sensory nerve conduction was abnormal in 64% of patients — and the landmark 1990 NEJM study by Logigian et al. documented peripheral nerve dysfunction in 36% of late Lyme patients, most of whom had normal neurological examinations.
The most common form in late Lyme disease. Multiple nerves are affected, typically starting distally — in the hands and feet — and progressing proximally over time. Symptoms are often symmetric: both hands, or both feet, affected in a similar pattern. Patients describe numbness, tingling, burning, or a “glove and stocking” sensory loss. Standard nerve conduction studies may show mild slowing, but negative results do not rule out neuropathy — particularly in small fiber involvement, where standard testing is unreliable.
Nerve root inflammation is one of the classic presentations of Lyme neuroborreliosis, particularly in European strains (Bannwarth’s syndrome). Pain radiates from the spine along the path of an affected nerve root — into the arm, the leg, the chest, or the abdomen. It is typically worse at night, described as sharp, jabbing, deep and boring, or electric. It is frequently misidentified as a herniated disc, intercostal neuralgia, or unexplained abdominal pain.
A pattern in which multiple individual peripheral nerves are affected, but in an asymmetric and sometimes seemingly random distribution — one hand, one foot, one facial area. Research suggests that virtually all Lyme-related peripheral neuropathies are manifestations of this underlying pattern. It results from inflammatory vasculitis (blood vessel inflammation) that Borrelia produces around nerve sheaths, cutting off the blood supply to individual nerve segments.
Standard electromyography (nerve conduction studies) tests large myelinated nerve fibres. Small fiber neuropathy — which is extremely common in Lyme patients — affects unmyelinated and thinly myelinated fibres that are invisible to standard EMG. A normal EMG in a patient with burning, tingling, and pain does not mean the neuropathy is imaginary. It means the right test has not been done.
Small fiber neuropathy — the most frequently missed diagnosis
Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is a condition in which the small, unmyelinated nerve fibres that carry pain, temperature, and autonomic signals are selectively damaged. Because these fibres are too small to appear on standard nerve conduction studies, the diagnosis requires either a skin punch biopsy (which counts nerve endings in a skin sample) or specialised quantitative sensory function testing.
SFN is one of the more consistent and overlooked features of Lyme disease. Patients present with burning pain, allodynia (pain from a stimulus that does not normally cause pain, such as light touch or the weight of bedsheets), temperature dysregulation, and autonomic symptoms — but their standard neurological workup returns normal. They are told their symptoms are functional, stress-related, or psychosomatic.
Burning in the feet, particularly at night. Hypersensitivity to touch — clothing feels painful, or walking on a hard floor creates an intense unpleasant sensation. Temperature dysregulation — feeling that one part of the body is hot when it is not, or cold intolerance far beyond what the room temperature explains. Prickling, crawling skin sensations. These symptoms tend to be worst at night and often worsen during herxheimer reactions.
Ask specifically for a skin punch biopsy for intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD). This is the gold standard for SFN diagnosis. Biopsies are taken from the lower leg and thigh, and the density of small nerve endings is counted. Reduced density confirms small fiber neuropathy. This must be specifically requested — it will not be offered automatically in a standard neurology workup.
Small fibers also carry signals that regulate automatic body functions — heart rate, blood pressure, digestion, sweating, and bladder control. When damaged, autonomic dysregulation follows: postural dizziness when standing, abnormal sweating, heart rate fluctuations, digestive motility problems, and bladder urgency. SFN therefore bridges the neurological and autonomic symptom clusters and may be a central mechanism in dysautonomia seen in Lyme patients.
Cranial nerve involvement — Bell’s palsy and beyond
The cranial nerves are twelve pairs of nerves that emerge directly from the brain and control the face, head, and several organ systems. Lyme disease has a well-documented predilection for cranial nerves — particularly the facial nerve (cranial nerve VII), but not exclusively. Cranial nerve involvement can be single or multiple, unilateral or bilateral, and may occur without any other obvious signs of infection.
Facial nerve palsy produces weakness or complete paralysis of the muscles on one side of the face: the eye may not fully close, the corner of the mouth droops, and the ability to raise an eyebrow on the affected side is lost. In Lyme disease, it is often bilateral — affecting both sides, sometimes not simultaneously. Bilateral Bell’s palsy is rare in other conditions and should be considered a red flag for Lyme neuroborreliosis. CDC reporting data show facial palsy in 9 out of every 100 reported Lyme cases.
Lyme can affect cranial nerve VIII (vestibulocochlear) — producing tinnitus, hearing loss, or vestibular disturbance. Cranial nerve VI (abducens) — causing double vision or inability to move the eye fully laterally. Cranial nerve II (optic nerve) — producing visual changes, light sensitivity, or optic neuritis. Cranial nerve X (vagus) — with effects on heart rate, digestion, and swallowing. Any cranial neuropathy without a clearly established cause warrants investigation for tick-borne illness.
Bell’s palsy is frequently treated as idiopathic with a short course of corticosteroids, then monitored for recovery. In patients whose facial palsy is caused by Lyme disease, corticosteroids alone will not resolve the underlying infection. If Lyme neuroborreliosis is not identified and treated with antibiotics, the infection continues and neurological involvement may deepen. Any new-onset facial palsy should prompt specific Lyme testing, particularly with any history of tick exposure or time in endemic regions.
Trigeminal neuralgia — facial nerve pain and its connection to Lyme
Trigeminal neuralgia is characterised by sudden, severe, electric-shock pain along the distribution of the trigeminal nerve — the largest cranial nerve, responsible for sensation across most of the face. The pain is typically unilateral, affects the cheek, jaw, teeth, gums, or forehead, lasts from seconds to a few minutes, and can be triggered by light touch, chewing, speaking, or even a breeze across the face. Between episodes, the area may be numb or have a persistent burning background.
In standard neurology, trigeminal neuralgia is most often attributed to vascular compression of the nerve root near the brainstem. What is less widely known is that Lyme neuroborreliosis is a documented cause of neurogenic pain indistinguishable from trigeminal neuralgia, and that Lyme should be ruled out in any patient presenting with this pattern — particularly those with exposure to tick habitats.
The trigeminal nerve can be directly invaded by Borrelia or inflamed by the immune response to infection. Inflammation of the trigeminal nerve root or ganglion produces exactly the kind of episodic, severe, lancinating facial pain seen in classical trigeminal neuralgia. In Lyme patients, this pain may be accompanied by other cranial nerve signs, or may appear in isolation. Pain neurology literature identifies Lyme as a rule-out diagnosis in any atypical facial pain or neuralgia syndrome.
Standard brain MRI looks for vascular compression of the trigeminal root. When no compression is found, the neuralgia is labelled idiopathic and managed symptomatically — anticonvulsants like carbamazepine suppress the pain signal. These medications may reduce the symptom but do nothing to address an underlying infection. In Lyme-related trigeminal neuralgia, the pain is driven by an active infectious process; suppressing the nerve signal while leaving the infection untreated allows neurological damage to progress.
Any new-onset facial neuralgia — particularly if it appears alongside other neurological symptoms, fatigue, joint involvement, or a history in tick-endemic environments — should prompt specific Lyme testing. Because standard two-tier Lyme testing misses a significant proportion of cases, a negative result does not rule out Lyme-related neuralgia. Discussion with a physician experienced in tick-borne illness is appropriate if the clinical picture suggests infection.
Lyme encephalopathy — when the brain itself is the target
Lyme encephalopathy refers to diffuse brain dysfunction caused by Lyme disease — not a localised lesion, but a global disruption of brain function driven by infection and neuroinflammation. It is distinct from frank encephalitis (direct infection of brain tissue), though that too can occur. Encephalopathy is the mechanism behind many of the cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms that make Lyme so confusing and so devastating.
Brain fog is not a vague complaint. It is a clinical state characterised by slowed processing speed, impaired working memory, difficulty with word retrieval, inability to sustain attention, and a feeling of cognitive unreliability. Neuropsychological testing in Lyme patients with encephalopathy has consistently shown measurable deficits in these areas, even when structural MRI appears normal. The mechanism involves cytokine-mediated disruption of neuronal signalling, reduced cerebral blood flow in affected areas, and in some cases direct bacterial invasion of brain tissue.
Brain MRI in Lyme encephalopathy frequently shows no abnormality on standard sequences — which is why patients are told there is nothing wrong. However, SPECT (single-photon emission computed tomography) imaging measures blood flow rather than structure. Research at Johns Hopkins using SPECT in Lyme patients revealed hypoperfusion — areas of reduced blood flow — in a pattern distinct from other neurological conditions, correlating with patients’ reported cognitive symptoms. SPECT is not a routine scan and is not available in most standard neurology practices.
Cerebrospinal fluid analysis in Lyme neuroborreliosis may show elevated protein, elevated white blood cells, and — critically — oligoclonal bands, which are immunoglobulin patterns associated with CNS inflammation and considered a hallmark of multiple sclerosis. Their presence in Lyme patients has led directly to misdiagnosis of MS. Research published in PLOS One demonstrated that oligoclonal bands in Lyme neuroborreliosis are in fact borrelia-specific — targeted against the infecting bacterium — rather than the self-reactive antibodies of MS. In MS, oligoclonal bands persist indefinitely. In Lyme, they disappear with successful treatment.
Non-restorative sleep is one of the most consistent and debilitating features of Lyme encephalopathy. It is not simply insomnia — it is structural. Sleep studies in Lyme patients show disruption of deep slow-wave sleep: the stage during which neurological repair, glymphatic clearance (the brain’s waste-removal system), and memory consolidation occur. When this stage is impaired, cognitive dysfunction worsens, immune function is suppressed, and inflammatory burden increases — creating a self-perpetuating loop.
When Lyme mimics multiple sclerosis
Multiple sclerosis and Lyme neuroborreliosis share a remarkable number of features: demyelinating lesions on MRI, oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid, relapsing-remitting symptom course, cranial nerve involvement, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and sensory disturbances. The overlap is not coincidental — both conditions involve immune-mediated damage to myelin, the insulating material around nerve fibres. The difference is the cause: in MS, myelin damage is autoimmune; in Lyme neuroborreliosis, it is driven by an active infection.
Lyme neuroborreliosis is explicitly listed in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in multiple peer-reviewed publications, including the Belgian Charcot Foundation guidelines and a review in Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. The instruction to rule out Lyme before diagnosing MS is present in the literature. Whether it is followed in practice is a different question.
Both can produce white matter lesions (T2 hyperintensities) on brain MRI. Both can produce oligoclonal bands in CSF. Both can produce relapsing-remitting episodes of neurological symptoms separated by periods of partial or complete remission. Both can affect vision, balance, sensation, bladder function, and cognition. A patient with these features who tests seronegative on standard Lyme testing may receive an MS diagnosis by exclusion.
MS lesions have characteristic locations (periventricular, juxtacortical, infratentorial, spinal cord) following McDonald criteria; Lyme lesions are less constrained and often smaller. MS oligoclonal bands persist indefinitely; Lyme oligoclonal bands are borrelia-specific and clear with treatment. MS is not associated with the radiculopathy, marked joint involvement, autonomic dysfunction, or geographic and tick-exposure clustering that Lyme produces. Bilateral Bell’s palsy and the typical Bannwarth radicular pain pattern are not features of MS.
MS is treated with immunosuppressive disease-modifying drugs. If the underlying condition is an active infection, immunosuppressive therapy can allow the infection to progress unchecked. Patients who receive MS medications for undiagnosed Lyme neuroborreliosis may deteriorate in ways they would not have otherwise — because the treatment has suppressed the immune response that was partially containing the infection. This is described in published clinical case reports.
Standard two-tier Lyme testing has documented sensitivity limitations in late neurological disease. Clinicians experienced in Lyme use additional CSF markers, particularly CXCL13 — a chemokine elevated in Lyme neuroborreliosis that can be detectable even when antibody testing is negative. A 2018 study found that 73% of Lyme neuroborreliosis patients with elevated CSF white cells but no detectable Lyme antibodies had raised CXCL13 levels. The threshold of >160 pg/mL has been proposed as consistent with Lyme neuroborreliosis.
Lyme and neurodegeneration — Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s
This section covers one of the most significant and most contested areas in Lyme disease research: the hypothesis that chronic spirochetal infection — including Borrelia burgdorferi — may be a contributing cause of neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease and, to a lesser degree, Parkinson’s disease. This is not fringe speculation. It is supported by peer-reviewed research published in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, Neurobiology of Aging, and Journal of Neuroinflammation. At the same time, the scientific community remains divided, and a causal relationship has not been proven by the standards of large randomised controlled trials. What follows is an honest account of what the evidence shows.
The connection between spirochetal infection and dementia was established long before the Lyme hypothesis. Treponema pallidum — the spirochete that causes syphilis — is a well-documented cause of dementia in its late stage. Late-stage syphilis (general paresis) produces brain atrophy, cognitive decline, amyloid deposition, and neurofibrillary tangles — the same pathological features that define Alzheimer’s disease. Dr. Judith Miklossy, Swiss neuropathologist and Director of the Prevention Alzheimer International Foundation, has argued that Borrelia burgdorferi may operate in an analogous way.
In 1986, Dr. Alan MacDonald first reported the presence of Borrelia burgdorferi in the brain tissue of an Alzheimer’s patient. Miklossy’s research, published in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease in 2004, confirmed the presence of Borrelia antigens and genes co-localised with beta-amyloid deposits in Alzheimer’s brain tissue. A 2022 study by Senejani et al. in the same journal found Borrelia co-localising with amyloid and phosphorylated tau — the two pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s — in post-mortem brain tissue from both Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s patients.
A central pillar of Alzheimer’s research has been the amyloid hypothesis — the idea that accumulation of beta-amyloid protein is the primary cause of neurodegeneration. This hypothesis has struggled: dozens of clinical trials targeting amyloid have largely failed to produce the cognitive improvements predicted. An alternative view, supported by MacDonald’s and Miklossy’s work, is that amyloid accumulation may be a downstream consequence of chronic infection — the brain’s attempt to trap and neutralise bacteria. In this model, amyloid is not the disease; it is the scar tissue of a persistent infectious process. If this model is correct, treating infection early may prevent the downstream accumulation.
Miklossy’s 2011 review in the Journal of Neuroinflammation — “Alzheimer’s disease: a neurospirochetosis” — analysed all available data from 247 examined cases. The analysis found a statistically significant association between spirochetes and Alzheimer’s (p = 1.5 × 10¹&sup7;, odds ratio = 20). When techniques detecting all types of spirochetes were used, spirochetal infection was observed in more than 90% of Alzheimer’s brain tissue. Borrelia burgdorferi specifically was detected in 25.3% of Alzheimer’s cases — thirteen times more frequently than in controls.
Miklossy et al.’s 2006 study in Neurobiology of Aging exposed primary mammalian neuronal and glial cells to Borrelia spirochetes in culture. The result: elevated amyloid precursor protein levels, beta-amyloid deposition, tau hyperphosphorylation, and structures morphologically identical to Alzheimer’s senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles — none of which were observed in uninfected control cultures. This is not an association study. The spirochetes directly produced Alzheimer’s pathology in otherwise healthy brain cells.
The research connection between Borrelia and Parkinson’s is less developed but documented. The 2022 Senejani study found Borrelia antigens and DNA in brain tissue from Parkinson’s patients, co-localising with amyloid and tau markers. Separately, Lyme disease can produce a syndrome clinically mimicking Parkinson’s: tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia (slowness of movement), and gait disturbances. There are peer-reviewed case reports of Parkinson’s-like syndromes reversing or substantially improving with Lyme treatment when the underlying infection is identified.
The evidence for Borrelia in Alzheimer’s brain tissue is real and published in peer-reviewed journals. The evidence that Borrelia directly induces Alzheimer’s pathology in cell cultures is real. The statistical association between spirochetal infection and Alzheimer’s diagnosis is real. What has not been established by large prospective controlled studies is definitive causality — whether eliminating the infection prevents or reverses the degenerative process. The scientific establishment currently regards the infectious hypothesis as unproven. This does not mean it is wrong — it means the research is incomplete.
As Dr. Miklossy has observed: spirochetal infection occurs years or decades before the manifestation of dementia. If an infectious contribution to Alzheimer’s is eventually confirmed, prevention and treatment would become possible — as they are in syphilitic dementia — through appropriate antimicrobial intervention. The stakes of this research question are therefore extraordinary.
Bartonella’s distinct neurological role
Bartonella — primarily Bartonella henselae and Bartonella quintana — is one of the most neurologically aggressive co-infections associated with tick-borne illness. While Borrelia’s neurological effects are primarily mediated through inflammation and nerve invasion, Bartonella has a particular affinity for the vascular endothelium (the lining of blood vessels) throughout the entire body, including the brain. It is increasingly recognised as a significant independent driver of neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms, and its contribution is frequently invisible because specific Bartonella testing is not part of standard Lyme workup.
Bartonella infection is associated with a neuropsychiatric profile that is strikingly distinct from Borrelia: agitation, sudden severe anxiety, mood instability, rage or emotional dysregulation that feels out of character, and in some cases presentations that resemble bipolar disorder, psychosis, or personality change. These effects are believed to be driven by Bartonella’s invasion of the brain’s vascular supply, triggering neuroinflammation in limbic and prefrontal regions.
Bartonella produces the characteristic stretch-mark-like striae seen on the skin (described in the dermatological cluster) through vascular inflammation. It produces similar inflammation in the vascular supply to peripheral nerves, contributing a neuropathy that compounds Borrelia’s direct nerve damage. Some researchers describe Bartonella as producing more severe and rapid-onset neurological involvement than Borrelia alone, particularly in the central nervous system.
Standard Lyme testing does not test for Bartonella. Specific Bartonella serology requires its own testing — which may also be unreliable in chronic infection because Bartonella, like Borrelia, can evade antibody production. The clinical picture — neuropsychiatric volatility, diffuse vasculitic symptoms, and stretch marks without the typical joint involvement of Lyme — may be the most useful diagnostic signal. A physician who does not consider Bartonella will not find it.
When every test comes back normal — and what to do
One of the defining experiences of neurological Lyme disease is the cycle of normal results. MRI is normal. EMG is normal. Standard Lyme serology is negative. The neurologist says nothing structural is wrong. You are referred back to your GP, or to a psychiatrist, or told your symptoms are functional. Understanding why tests come back normal, and which tests actually detect what, is essential to navigating this cycle.
Standard MRI detects structural changes: lesions, tissue destruction, mass effects. Neurological Lyme is predominantly a functional disruption — inflammation that alters how nerves signal without destroying visible tissue. SPECT imaging, which measures blood flow rather than structure, is more likely to show abnormalities in Lyme encephalopathy. However, SPECT is not a routine scan and is not available in most standard neurology practices.
The standard two-tier test measures the antibody response to Borrelia — it does not detect the bacteria directly. In people who are immunosuppressed, or whose infection has been partially treated, or in whom the immune response has not yet fully developed, antibody levels may be too low to trigger a positive result. Studies suggest the two-tier test has sensitivity of approximately 40–60% in early disease. Late neurological involvement is precisely the stage at which false negatives remain common.
Skin punch biopsy for intraepidermal nerve fiber density (small fiber neuropathy). CXCL13 in cerebrospinal fluid as a marker of Lyme neuroborreliosis if lumbar puncture is performed. Igenex or other specialty laboratory Western blot testing, which uses a wider range of Borrelia antigens than the CDC-approved test. Specific Bartonella serology (IgG and IgM to Bartonella henselae and quintana). Neuropsychological testing to quantify cognitive deficits that imaging misses. None of these tests are definitive in isolation, but they are the appropriate tools for the clinical picture.
A written symptom timeline: when each symptom appeared, how it has evolved, what makes it better or worse. All previous tests and their results. Any history of tick exposure, outdoor activity, or time in endemic regions. A clear description of the fluctuation pattern — whether symptoms wax and wane, whether they worsen with exertion or illness, whether you have had periods of improvement followed by deterioration. The physician who takes this history seriously is the physician worth working with.
Healing mentality checkpoint
Neurological symptoms are among the most frightening a person can experience. The fear that something irreversible is happening to the brain — the thing that makes you who you are — is not irrational. It is a reasonable response to an experience that medicine has consistently failed to explain.
What this page is intended to offer is not a diagnosis, and not certainty. It is a map. If the pattern described here resembles your experience, you now have the language to pursue the next step of investigation with more direction and less dependence on a system that may not yet be asking the right questions.
Read about healing mentality →Sources & further reading
- Logigian EL et al. — Chronic neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease, NEJM, 1990
- Halperin JJ — Lyme disease and the peripheral nervous system, Muscle & Nerve, 2003
- Halperin JJ et al. — Clinical and electrophysiologic findings in chronic neuropathy of Lyme disease, Neurology, 1992
- Fallon BA, Nields JA — Lyme disease: a neuropsychiatric illness, American Journal of Psychiatry, 1994
- Miklossy J — Alzheimer’s disease — a neurospirochetosis. Analysis of the evidence following Koch’s and Hill’s criteria, Journal of Neuroinflammation, 2011
- Miklossy J et al. — Borrelia burgdorferi persists in the brain in chronic Lyme neuroborreliosis and may be associated with Alzheimer disease, Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2004
- Miklossy J et al. — Beta-amyloid deposition and Alzheimer’s-type changes induced by Borrelia spirochetes, Neurobiology of Aging, 2006
- Senejani AG et al. — Borrelia burgdorferi co-localizing with amyloid markers in Alzheimer’s disease brain tissues, Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2022
- MacDonald AB — Plaques of Alzheimer’s disease originate from cysts of Borrelia burgdorferi, Medical Hypotheses, 2006
- Jonczak E et al. — Neuropsychiatric Manifestations of Lyme Disease, PMC, 2024
- CDC — Clinical Care and Treatment of Neurologic Lyme Disease (cdc.gov)
- Dr. Todd Maderis — Neurological Lyme Disease (drtoddmaderis.com)
- Horowitz R — Why Can’t I Get Better? (2013)
- Buhner SH — Healing Lyme, 2nd ed. (2015)
- ILADS clinical guidelines (ilads.org)
- Columbia University Lyme and Tick-borne Disease Research Center (columbiamedicine.org)
Last updated: March 2026